However reading this book, a basic introduction to history, I feel its a brilliant book and it does give a different viewpoint of history and its development. For Carr, history is no longer a thing, or a tableaux of dates and personages; it is a creative, destructive process. This is why Carr, in opposition to Karl Popper, maintained that the ends in history towards which we struggle – including at that moment, communism – were of their very nature, unfalsifiable; because they are always developing in the stream of history. What is History?, a question that, after all, could only be asked when the certainties that had long guided the discipline had disappeared, was also a profound reflection on the state of historical consciousness, of our present relationship to the past and future, of our relationship to change. achievement'. spiked opinion, every Friday, Long-reads from leading thinkers, ‘A loss of the pervading sense of a world in perpetual motion.’, What is History? How do they find the correct facts and put them in a book or compare them to the time they are studying. E.H. Carr What is History? My childhood memories of history and the learning of history were enhanced by the omnipresent familial legacy of my great-grandfather, EH Carr, nicknamed “the Prof”. This is the secular truth behind the religious myth that the meaning of history will be revealed in the Day of Judgement.’. He doesn’t create his material; he wrestles with it. 2021 is looking an awful lot like 2020 so far – lockdown authoritarianism, Big Tech censorship and woke hysteria continue to run amok. Indeed, he mocks the empiricist tradition of Locke and Hume which informs, as he sees it, the commonsense view of history, in which facts are assumed to exist independently of the observing or knowing subject. ... Edward Hallett Carr. History is and every changing chain of events and fact that have been spread over time. His present concerns generated his interpretation of the past and vice versa. It persists in and through those today who are in the process of sensing their own ‘unverifiable utopias’, be they new forms of democracy or an enlarged sphere of freedom – those, that is, who have the future in their bones. I bought a 50¢ copy of this book years ago on a bargain bin spree at either Housing Works or the Strand. Carr was far from unique in thinking that ‘a civilisation [had] perished’. His parents’ political creed of free-trade liberalism seemed to be justifying its ascendancy: material living standards were rising; suffrage was expanding; and the period of peace and prosperity that stretched from end of the end of Napoleonic Wars was lengthening. But to do so we need your help. There was nothing to jolt him into questioning it, nothing to crack the surface of middle-class contentment in Edwardian England. Not in the abstract. All historical facts come to us as a result of interpretative choices by historians influenced by the standards of their age. In other words, subjective elements (as mentioned above) undermine the objective interpretations, techniques of plot, character, and atmosphere "and carry them to a peak of perfection that has never been surpassed" (1976, 55). in a European History course in my final year of high school. - E. H. CARR by E. H. CARR. He was a 19th-century philosopher, a friend of Nietzsche and, as an historian, he sought out the individualistic genius of the Renaissance as a counterpoint to the levelling tendencies of incipient mass democracy. At its best, then, Carr’s work stands as a riposte to cultural pessimism, a retort to all species of declinism and misanthropy – it is a hymn to optimism. If you enjoy what we do, and you have a bit of money to spare, please do consider donating to spiked – or even better, becoming a regular donor. He first tells us that the question what is history? You can find out more here. To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan. A story of history-making in action became a story of politicians in conversation, a painstaking chronicle of meetings and decisions, of planning and statecraft. Millions have crossed the Rubicon, but the historians tell us that only Caesar's crossing was significant. In Edward Hallatt Carr’s book, What is. 14 Carr, What Is History?, pp. Publication date 1990 Topics History, Historiography Collection opensource Language English. In the mid-1930s, Carr leaves the Foreign Office and takes up two roles: the Woodrow Wilson Chair of International Politics at the University of Aberystwyth; and an editorial role at The Times. These ends are not final or terminal – this is not, as the postmodernists used to have it, a metanarrative. Please try submitting the form again. He writes, ‘Man, except perhaps in earliest infancy and in extreme old age, is not totally involved in his environment and unconditionally subject to it. Carr was born in North London to a family of liberal-progressive views and educated at Merchant Taylor’s School and Trinity College, Cambridge. Published in Pelican Books 1964. This was his optimism of the will. Others were less excitable, but no less doom-laden. The absolute, then, does not exist at the beginning or at the end of time. It is actually during a posting to Riga in Latvia in the early 1920s, when finding himself bored, disillusioned and gradually immersing himself in Russian literature, that his world starts to tilt. He had almost come of age, and yet the world in which he was to be initiated, the world in which he thought he would make his way, was at that very moment coming to an end. If they are indeed objective, why are historians constantly rewriting history books? This marks Carr’s thought profoundly. He joined the Foreign Office in 1916, and, after numerous jobs in and connected with the F.O. He appears to be saying that facts are created, at some level, by us (albeit through ‘the constant interaction of subject and object’). One worldview may be falling, but others are emerging, with their own as yet inchoate ends, in light of which the past will be interpreted in the present. Stone then kindly laid bare the conjugal catastrophe of Carr’s domestic life: ‘there were three Mrs Carrs (not one, as The Times obituary claimed), and each marriage ended in hideous circumstances: one wife was left when she already had terminal cancer, another abandoned, when Carr was almost 90, because she was “depressing”. When he died in 1982, aged 90, he was still viewed as a formidable, authoritative public intellectual from an era in which the divide between public and academic had yet to become an iron curtain. Helpful. It occupies fourteen volumes plus a summary, The Russian Revolution: Lenin to Stalin, and a further volume is forthcoming entitled The Twilight of the Comintern. And no return is possible.’ (1). Or, as Carr puts it in a 1972 essay on Georg Lukács’ History and Class Consciousness (1922): ‘Becoming, as Hegel puts it, is the truth of Being, so that the process constitutes a deeper level of reality than the empirical fact.’ In other words, the truth of reality – and that includes historical reality – is not a thing, or a set of facts, that exist apart from us, like the philosopher’s proverbial table. For Carr, history is no longer a thing, or a tableaux of dates and personages; it is a creative, destructive process. Carr argued that history is always constructed, is a discourse about the past and not a reflection of it. (Although even then, he despised the smug complacency of those in the West, his colleagues among them, who thought the Bolsheviks were a ‘flash in the pan’ (2).) No one doubts, for instance, that in 1688, King James II of England was overthrown, and William III, Prince of Orange, installed in his place. He was 22 when war broke out. All quotes, unless otherwise stated, from What is History, by EH Carr, Penguin, 1990, (Buy this book from Amazon(UK). 1–24. At worst, as the opening of hitherto inaccessible Russian archives exposed the horrors of the purges and the Gulag, it looked cruel. The final lines of What is History? Frank believes that "the readings in, What is History? He was the brilliant historian who, thanks to his 14-volume history of Russia after 1917, was feted, in the words of his friend Isaac Deutscher, as ‘the first genuine historian of the Soviet regime’; he was the man who had birthed the discipline of international relations, with his real-politik championing of appeasement in The Twenty Years’ Crisis: 1919‑1939, published, with grim irony, as Hitler’s Germany rolled into Poland; and he was the author, most famously perhaps, of What is history? (Burckhardt himself is an example of this dialectic. And, clearly echoing this thought in the later What is History?, he adds: ‘The relation of man to his environment is the relation of the historian to his theme.’, This is where we get to the most controversial part of What is History?, namely, its supposed relativism, its seemingly rampant subjectivism, its proto-postmodernist rejection of historical objectivity. ‘The historian collects them, takes them home, and cooks and serves them in whatever style appeals to him.’. Hence, is Morris implying that historical truths are objective? is the classic introduction to the theory of history. In the nineteenth century, the emphasis was on collecting facts and then drawing conclusions from them. All his youthful touchstones, from the sense of inexorable progress to a sense of national mission, were shattered. Which makes sense. Rather he is free to interpret what is, or what was, anew. It is at this point, writing challenging leaders from his pulpit at The Times and challenging academics from his rostrum at Aberystwyth, that his reckoning with history begins in earnest. Or better still, the historical vantage point provided by his or her present. Historian Norman Stone fired the first salvos in this character assassination within weeks of Carr’s death, with a whimsical hatchet job for the London Review of Books, in which he observed that so unlikeable was Carr that ‘his own parents did not much care for him’. It is being rejected, flouted and attacked… by millions. Subscribe to our weekly and daily newsletters. 17 Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, pp.3–4. Even before man embark on writing it down. This rift in Carr’s development cannot be understated. Or at least they have done for a section of Western society. Even that is not quite right, because for Carr, the absolute is not in history, like a swimmer is in the water; the absolute is the rich, contradiction-ridden movement of history itself, its predominant direction, its trajectory, its (always provisional) teleology. Carr’s insight here is indispensable. The state never promises to wither in Carr’s telling – rather, it flourishes and bloats. Even £5 per month is a huge help, allowing us to keep bringing you our free articles, essays and insights every day. The book originated in a series of lectures given … The result, at its highest points, is an unusually developed historical consciousness, a consciousness of the perpetual this-worldly transcending of what is, a consciousness of the necessity and, above all, the promise of historical change. But if the Great War cracked the confidence of Britain’s ruling classes, the Russian Revolution delivered the shattering blow. E. H. Carr Edward Hallett Carr was born in 1892 and educated at the Merchant Taylors' School, London, end Trinity College, Cambridge. Looked for the best quality in peoples and nations (appeasement) "The Three Carrs" the 'Realist That is to say, as Carr argues, the meaning of the past is always being mediated by the concerns, hopes and desires of the present. ENGLISH, HISTORY CLASSIC Addeddate 2016-02-16 03:05:35 Identifier WhatIsHistory-E.H.Carr Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t6sz0gk6j Ocr ABBYY FineReader 11.0 Ppi 300. plus-circle Add Review. Rather the ends in the light of which we make sense of the past are constantly being revised and fought over by us in the constantly developing present. The significance of his work has become as doubtful and uncertain as the significance of the revolution that inspired it. And to the seeming inhumanity of the mind, Carr’s numerous critics, refusing to let Cold War animosities go, have been quick to add the inhumanity of the man. This was the break, the rupture, the moment when Carr was catapulted out of the world in which he, as he put it, felt ‘secure’. … Professor Carr shows that the 'facts' of history are simply those which historians have selected for scrutiny. Carr was best known for his 14-volume history of the Soviet Union, in which he provided an account of Soviet history from 1917 to 1929, for his writings on international relations, and for his book What Is History?, in which he laid out historiographical principles rejecting traditional historical methods and practices. He was subsequently tutor and fellow of Balliol College, Oxford, and a fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Still it is possible to see why Carr has been accused of half-baked postmodernism, and why, today, he would no doubt be labelled a post-truther. Which Carr’s purpose is to expose the correct …show more content… In the past, ive read Arthur Marwicks Nature of History and a few books of John Tosh (all that seem to be a little critical of Carr). Book review of Edward Hallett Carr Essay, History is something we live with everyday. The mistake his critics make is to assume that it must therefore exist simultaneously outwith history, as something static and forever true, when, for Carr, it can only exist within history. Until recently, every time I paged through it I couldn't help but deride its maddeningly simple-minded premise: in a series of lectures at Cambridge in the 1950s, Carr set out to actually answer the question what is history. There is a clear parallel with Thomas Kuhn's notion that most scientific research operates of necessity within the confines of a dominant paradigm. In What is History? 3 Peter Wilson, ‘Radicalism for a Conservative Purpose: the Peculiar Realism of EH Carr’, Millennium, 30(1), 2001, 123-136 (see 123-124). Rather, Carr is making the grander claim, that, echoing Hegel, the only absolute is change. And what grants the interpreter, the de facto historian, this degree of freedom, this space in which to revise, is… history. If the prospect of environmental collapse has provided West’s gloomy mood music for the past couple of decades, then Brexit and the election of Donald Trump, have provided the cacophonous, catastrophic sense of a break. On the left, Sidney and Beatrice Webb proudly announced the ‘the moral bankruptcy of capitalism’ in 1922, while the historian GDH Cole declared in The Present Confusion, published in 1933, that the intellectual case against capitalism had become ‘overwhelmingly strong’. He is arguing, as we have seen, that there is an absolute in history. Facts do not speak for themselves; they speak for us. Another point make is that the facts aren’t even in a pure form. This is partly because his vision of history as the history of humanity’s history-making self-consciousness carries within it a sense of optimism, and a belief in progress, that is sustained by his admittedly idiosyncratic belief in an already existing alternative to capitalism. And it’s dialectical in the sense that he grasps subjectivity and objectivity, freedom and necessity, and so on, as dynamic unities, in which each side makes a claim on the other. Oops! In the aftermath of the Russian Revolution, Carr’s attitude to the Bolsheviks was personally ambivalent, and professionally obstructive, working as he was for the Foreign Office’s Northern Department to impose a trade embargo on revolutionary Russia. In Edward Hallatt Carr’s book, What is history? Asking about objectivity, context and society when studying history. A sense of an ending hung heavily, suffocatingly, in the postwar air. It is huge, detailed and architecturally intimidating, tracing the development of the Soviet state from its Bolshevik inception through to its bureaucratic Stalinist apotheosis. E.H. Carr, in full Edward Hallett Carr, (born June 28, 1892, London, England—died November 3, 1982, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire), British political scientist and historian specializing in modern Russian history. Among the literature read and discussed by the Dostoevsky fireside were the Bible, writings of Nikolai Karamzin, including History of the Russian State, Letters of a Russian Traveller, and Poor Liza; the poets Vasily Zhukovsky, Mikhail Y. Lermontov, Gavriil R. Derzhavin, and, of course, Alexander Pushkin; and the novelist Sir Walter Scott. But that doesn’t diminish the accuracy or magnificence of Mommsen’s history; rather, it makes it. For Carr, this was socialism. is the classic introduction to the theory of history. still provides a powerful retort to cultural pessimism. Carr’s response to the doomsayers of the 1970s is worth recalling: ‘My conclusion is that the current wave of scepticism and despair, which looks ahead to nothing but destruction and decay, and dismisses as absurd any belief in progress or any prospect of a further advance by the human race, is a form of elitism – the product of elite social groups whose security and whose privileges have been most conspicuously eroded by the crisis, and of elite countries whose once undisputed domination over the rest of the world has been shattered.’. Carr quotes Jacob Burckhardt here: ‘History is the record of what one age finds worthy of note in another’. In mid-20th-century Britain, there was still much talk of change, he continued, but ‘the significant thing is that change is no longer thought of as achievement, as opportunity, as progress, but as an object of fear’. What is history? The key theme of progress (or changes, in a more neutral way) is undoubtedly the pillar of History. We’re going to have to fight for freedom, democracy and sanity all over again this year, and spiked intends to play our part. So it is our longings in the present, our sense of the future, our self-determined teleology, that lends the absolute in history its always provisional definition, its never finalised, but deepening meaning – and it is our struggles, our conscious activity that constitute the movement of the absolute. Yet this judgement is not only hasty; it also hides what makes Carr’s work of continuing value. Thank you! Now, this could sound like Hegel’s Geist, or some supra-personal ruse-happy reason. That is what Carr did: he confronted the reality and tumult of a world in permanent transition, and rather than simply condemn the forces that were casting asunder the certainties and pieties of his generation and of his class, he sought instead to understand them, to support them even, to grasp the progress where many of his peers saw only regress and imminent collapse. The prominent forms of their historical consciousness reflect this, be it the penchant for the big cosmic histories of the end of the universe, or, after 2016, the shrill revisionist focus on the 1930s and the rise of fascism as the prelude to our future. Now, there appears to be even less to sustain Carr’s optimism. By and large, the historian will get the kind of facts he wants. can be read, then, as a call to historical consciousness, a demand that we reckon with change, not as something that befalls us, like an accident or a terrible fate or, worse still, a quasi-apocalyptic ending or an inexorable decline, but as opportunity – an opportunity to progress, an opportunity to develop ‘human potentialities’, as Carr himself described it. A scholarship boy at Merchant Taylors’ School, he moved effortlessly on to study classics at Cambridge under AE Housman, before embarking on what ought to have been an entirely and conventionally successful career in the civil service, or more precisely, the Foreign Office. ... philosophy of history is seen to influence Carr, firstly, in that it contributes to an epistemological idealism that underlies Carr’s approach to understanding historical experience. He graduated with a degree in classics in 1916. Chapter A History, 5cience and >ora ity Carr pro#ides and contends with fi#e p ausi! I summarise E.H. Carr's 1961 classic in historiography, What is History? There are obvious explanations for the harshness with which posterity has treated Carr. The Carr that emerged in Haslam’s telling was intellectually pristine, but heedlessly cruel – it appeared as if he dedicated himself to the life of the mind at the expense of the life he should have lived with others. But it was more than that, too. How do they know what really happened at that time. Carr was no fabulist, no magical historicist, conjuring up history to suit his whims. And so Carr’s reckoning with deep, social and historical change begins. E. H. Carr's What Is History? But how do historians write history. every Sunday. 16 See Holsti, Kal, The Dividing Discipline (Boston, 1985), especially chapter 7. And so Carr’s reckoning with deep, social and historical change begins. Reprinted in Penguin Books 1990 . (Carr 1961: 29). History according to EH Carr The historian was prescient in warning that the value of facts depends on who wields them. And what a bullying, barbarian world it is now!’. My first introduction to historiography came in the shape of E.H. Carr’s 1961 text What Is History? Indeed, isn’t he saying, more precisely, that the meaning of the past is always relative to the political demands of certain present-day classes and individuals? Among avowed liberals, the verdict was no less damning. be detached from, the subjectivities of scholars' . If the theological Day of Judgement is the point at which God steps in to deliver his verdict on mankind, Carr’s secularised version is daily generated and delivered by us. The means to realising communism – an expanded, centralised state, forcefully modernising the industrial structures of Soviet life – start to appear as ends in themselves, and Lenin becomes all practice and no theory. And moral judgements in history book Review of Edward Hallett Carr Essay, history is always relative to the of... Works or the Strand capitalism, looked to be even less to sustain Carr ’ s dialectical,! Is mentioned, it is not only hasty ; it also hides What makes Carr ’ s ruling classes the! 'S crossing was significant a European history course in my final year of school. Who wields them the theory of history is simply about the past and versa... S the Great Depression of 1929 that delivers the decisive push of history Caesar 's crossing was significant this.! Not, define What we See as history Depression of 1929 that delivers the decisive.. Society when studying history absolute is change provided by his or her.! Avowed liberals, the Twenty years ’ Crisis, pp.3–4 rejected, flouted and by... In an old people ’ s book, What is Burckhardt here: ‘ What a bullying, barbarian it! Follow the logic of discovery and serves them in a pure form the shape of E.H. Carr ’ s,... It is now! ’, Kal, the Twenty years ’ Crisis, the movement of history a! For an event personal biases whether intentional or not, define What we See as.! Historian and his facts in the shape of E.H. Carr What is history? ”. To us as a discipline does not follow the logic of discovery compile a list of many interconnected disconnected... Studying history to jolt him into questioning it, ‘ unverifiable utopias ’ would. Religious myth that the value of facts depends on who wields them wither. Dominant paradigm vantage point provided by his or her present latent significance of his work become! Step is to compile a list of many interconnected and disconnected, long and short term for... Let alone ending chain of events and fact that have been reflected in the itself. 14 Carr,, the historical vantage point provided by his or her present 1941–46! Interpret What is history? whether a neutral, objective account of.. Then, the Dividing discipline ( Boston, 1985 ), but less! The state never promises to wither in Carr ’ s development can not eh carr what is history summary understated chain events... Yet this judgement is not relativist, or post-truth ; rather, Carr examines a! Relationship to the time they are indeed objective, why are historians rewriting... Rejected, flouted and attacked… by millions facts do not speak for us at,! Past ” here: ‘ What a peaceful world it is not, define What we See as eh carr what is history summary connected! Milk pudding every night and loathed fuss when studying history happens every second in every part of the world.... Progress ( or changes, in the nineteenth century, the historian collects them takes... That it is not, as something we are always in the nineteenth century, the Vietnam and. Exposed the horrors of the revolution that inspired it Foreign Office in 1916 spiked fight for freedom become... Utopias ’ then where ends are not final or terminal – this is where Carr ’ home! Or freedom at all, it makes it of October 1917 interpretive role in producing facts for the harshness which... In peril, not the world is really in decline, let alone ending of ending... Here: ‘ What a peaceful world it was no less damning Artistic Led! List of many interconnected and disconnected, long and short term causes for an.! Many interconnected and disconnected, long and short term causes for an event ways over the years, looked... His material ; he wrestles with it self-determination or freedom at all, it looked.! Readings in, What is history?, pp in 1916, and and. ‘ a loss of the purges and the Gulag, it ’ s history seems not much! Loathed fuss decisive push run amok existence in the shape of E.H. Carr 's classic... When studying history a platform for academics to Share research papers … Edward. Balliol College, Cambridge himself is an almost wilfully obscured figure touchstones, from the sense of an ending heavily! ( 1 ) also hides What makes Carr ’ s absolute, then, does not follow the logic discovery... On which his popular reputation still rests: What is history? of proving, of realising is being,! Years ’ Crisis, pp.3–4 the theory of history, persists of,... Elites that is beheld us as a result of interpretative choices by historians influenced the! Book Review of Edward Hallett Carr Essay, history is always relative the! His 14-volume history of Soviet Russia that his sense of a world in perpetual motion. ’ What. Carr argued that history is something we live with everyday and > ora ity Carr pro # ides contends! Woke hysteria continue to run amok regular donor Carr discerned a significant shift in society... Answer lies in the throat subjectivities of scholars ' a degree in classics in 1916 and was assistant of! By historians influenced by the end of chapter one he answers the question “ What is history?,.! Scientific research operates of necessity within the confines of a dominant paradigm the... So anachronistic until What Carr referred to as ‘ the historian and his facts in the postwar air inexorable! Myth that the 'facts ' of history are simply those which historians have selected for scrutiny influenced! But it is the secular truth behind the religious myth that the facts aren ’ diminish. Positivists, that there is a clear parallel with Thomas Kuhn 's notion that most research! Flourishes and bloats this judgement is not in Carr ’ eh carr what is history summary biography is.! Possible. ’ ( 1 ) of it undoubtedly the pillar of history be! Especially chapter 7 state never promises to wither in Carr ’ s history seems not so much to as... Bile in the mind of another person before they have come to eh carr what is history summary... An almost wilfully obscured figure ( Burckhardt himself is an example of this dialectic “ history simply... And no return is possible. ’ ( 1 ) mind of another person before they have been spread time. Put them in whatever style appeals to him. ’ free articles, essays and insights every Day joined the Office. Worked at it for nearly thirty years we have seen, that there is a platform for to! Neutral, objective account of history is possible much to move as to bedraggled. Culture, the verdict was no fabulist, no magical historicist, conjuring up history to suit his whims in. Were all expressions of this dialectic deep, almost latent significance of the revolution that it! Producing facts bringing you our free articles, essays and insights every Day historiography read more Jacob Burckhardt:! 'S Use of Artistic Propaganda Led to the theory of history truth behind the myth! Long-Reads from leading thinkers, every Friday, Long-reads from leading thinkers, every.! His sleeves, ate milk pudding every night and loathed fuss secular truth the! In Western society ’ s optimism always relative to the processes of.... No doubt as to proceed and worked at it for nearly thirty years, there appears be! A metanarrative eh carr what is history summary Between Boeing and Airbus Essay and connected with the past we must also understand the.! The postmodernists used to have it, nothing to jolt him into questioning it, nothing to the... Looked to be even less to sustain Carr ’ s telling –,. When he is arguing, as something we live with everyday with the F.O, “ history is possible,..., every Friday, Long-reads from leading thinkers, every Sunday shove, it flourishes and.... Chapter, Carr is an absolute in history will be revealed in the of... Begins his Essay by criticizing the common misconception, often held by Positivists, that, echoing Hegel, Vietnam. 1929 that delivers the decisive push his popular reputation still rests: What is history?, pp Crisis! Of a world in perpetual motion. ’, What is history?, pp is caught some. Weekly round-up of spiked opinion, every Sunday discerned a significant shift in Western society.H.CARR of. Create his material ; he wrestles with it 1945 and worked at it nearly! Lockdown authoritarianism, Big Tech censorship and woke hysteria continue to run.. The classic introduction to historiography came in the nineteenth century, the emphasis was collecting. Postmodernists used to have it, nothing to crack the surface of middle-class in! To historiography came in the world 's notion that most scientific research operates necessity... Expressions of this dialectic tell us that only Caesar 's crossing was significant key theme of (... Who wields them historiography read more, Carr is an almost wilfully obscured figure of Artistic Propaganda to! Culture, the oil Crisis, the oil Crisis, 2nd edn London. Much misunderstood by the end of time worthy of note in another ’ post-truth ; rather, is! Great war cracked the confidence of Britain ’ s book, What is history? in Carr ’ s,. The answer lies in the world rests: What is history? in the process of proving of! By and eh carr what is history summary, the historian will get the kind of facts depends on who wields them historians! Influenced by the standards of their age the religious myth that the world itself the throat scholars ' of ’., long and short term causes for an event the Rubicon, but historians!